Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
;)
takes place here, always here, wherever one is and wherever one looks, closest
to home. Infinite responsibility, therefore, no rest allowed for any form of good
conscience.
But one should never speak of the assassination of a man as a figure, not even
an exemplary figure in the logic of an emblem, a rhetoric of the flag or of
martyrdom. A man's life, as unique as his death, will always be more than a
paradigm and something other than a symbol. And this is precisely what a proper
name should always name.
And yet. And yet, keeping this in mind and having recourse to a common noun,
I recall that it is a communist as such, a communist as communist, whom a
Polish emigrant and his accomplices, all the assassins of Chris Hani, put to death
a few days ago, April 10th. The assassins themselves proclaimed that they were
out to get a communist.