安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
;)
takes place here, always here, wherever one is and wherever one looks, closest
to home. Infinite responsibility, therefore, no rest allowed for any form of good
conscience.
But one should never speak of the assassination of a man as a figure, not even
an exemplary figure in the logic of an emblem, a rhetoric of the flag or of
martyrdom. A man's life, as unique as his death, will always be more than a
paradigm and something other than a symbol. And this is precisely what a proper
name should always name.
And yet. And yet, keeping this in mind and having recourse to a common noun,
I recall that it is a communist as such, a communist as communist, whom a
Polish emigrant and his accomplices, all the assassins of Chris Hani, put to death
a few days ago, April 10th. The assassins themselves proclaimed that they were
out to get a communist.