Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I think it safe to say that she did intentionally create an imbalanced game to begin with. Her stated intention was for it to be a teaching tool that would create suspicions about "unfair" societal systems for players after they had grown up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgism
There is another small advantage about how the "Jail" system works. But ultimately, I found the game completely imbalanced in favor of the Monopolists.
Given the political bent of the creator of the game, I actually think it was on purpose. To prove that real-world monopolies have an unfair advantage. But, it is kind of silly to have to do that, since everyone knows that monopolies have an unfair advantage. That is why anti-trust laws exist.