Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I think it safe to say that she did intentionally create an imbalanced game to begin with. Her stated intention was for it to be a teaching tool that would create suspicions about "unfair" societal systems for players after they had grown up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgism
There is another small advantage about how the "Jail" system works. But ultimately, I found the game completely imbalanced in favor of the Monopolists.
Given the political bent of the creator of the game, I actually think it was on purpose. To prove that real-world monopolies have an unfair advantage. But, it is kind of silly to have to do that, since everyone knows that monopolies have an unfair advantage. That is why anti-trust laws exist.