Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well thanks, this review is nearly 2 years old now, but I'm glad it helped someone out there.
Excellent question. This might need to be answered by dividing into multiple sections of both games:
- Gameplay wise, there are more features in Breakpoint (BP), like carrying bodies, teammates, more gun customization options, gadgets and special abilities to use, so BP takes the spot.
- In terms of the open worlds, even though BP has more leviation, more common different levels of height on the map, Wildlands has more variety and it's inhabitants feel more lively and realistic than the vast but devoid of life island of Auroa.
- Talking about graphics, BP is much more beautiful, dense and realistic than Wildlands. However, BP is optimized not so well on its Steam version. Lagging, FPS drops, stuttering happen frequently no matter how much I tweak the settings. I rarely ever had these issues in Wildlands, everything was smooth as butter most of the time.
Take my inputs as however you wish, and you could decide which one is better.