Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Well thanks, this review is nearly 2 years old now, but I'm glad it helped someone out there.
Excellent question. This might need to be answered by dividing into multiple sections of both games:
- Gameplay wise, there are more features in Breakpoint (BP), like carrying bodies, teammates, more gun customization options, gadgets and special abilities to use, so BP takes the spot.
- In terms of the open worlds, even though BP has more leviation, more common different levels of height on the map, Wildlands has more variety and it's inhabitants feel more lively and realistic than the vast but devoid of life island of Auroa.
- Talking about graphics, BP is much more beautiful, dense and realistic than Wildlands. However, BP is optimized not so well on its Steam version. Lagging, FPS drops, stuttering happen frequently no matter how much I tweak the settings. I rarely ever had these issues in Wildlands, everything was smooth as butter most of the time.
Take my inputs as however you wish, and you could decide which one is better.