16
Products
reviewed
156
Products
in account

Recent reviews by npc_pigeon

< 1  2 >
Showing 1-10 of 16 entries
8 people found this review helpful
0.4 hrs on record
meh. definitely not worth the years of hype at all. i had a feeling unreal would be an issue but thought all these years would iron out any issues. clearly not.


-why are you imitating an already existing engine? it just feels off. physics feel janky, the gravity gun feels odd, etc.

-weapon feedback is non-existent. the guns feel flimsy and weak, grav gun included.
-crowbar just feels weird to use, like i am hitting nothing.

-enemy design and feeling is boring. they just flop to the ground after being shot which doesnt even feel like you're doing that. cutting enemies in half isn't really fun either.

-honestly, considering the whole of the ravenholm maps already existed and you only added to them, i am surprised how little there is in this. i finished this in 10 mins. oh, and i tabbed out in the credits to write this review and i can't even tab back in, if my playtime says higher.

-headcrabs ragdolling was fine in HLA as they still wiggled and made noise. the headcrabs here do very little of either making it hard to tell if they are dead, especially when they start flying around even after dying.

-again why are you imitating an already existing engine? it feels like an imitation. maybe do your own thing or just use source/source 2?

-lastly, this whole tiny 10 min demo of basically 2 ravenholm maps in the unity engine was 5gb. hl2 in it's entirety is about 4gb. hl2 update is 6gb. god forbid how large a full game would be.

yeah idk not sure this was worth the hype. basically played through a tiny, worse feeling version of ravenholm in the snow with some fancy effects added. not much else.
Posted 12 November. Last edited 12 November.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
1.6 hrs on record
yeah really not worth it icl, just feels like a cash grab. wdym premium comes with half the stuff still missing??? bruh.
Posted 17 July.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
12.7 hrs on record (11.9 hrs at review time)
SHOTGUN GO BRRRRRRRR
Posted 16 April.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
8.8 hrs on record
Pros:

-Setting and enemies give off a Half-Life vibe (zurks look like a mashup of headcrabs and snarks with a vortigaunt eye lol).
-You are a cat and you can meow.
-Gameplay and story are decent and moderately engaging.

Cons:

-I had a few issues with areas loading in, forcing to go to checkpoints. But nothing too bad.
-The ending of the game is super super super anti-climactic. I WANT TO REUNITE WITH MY CAT FRIENDS IN THE BEGINNING

-I found it difficult to actually have a proper bond with any of the characters in the game, so their departures don't have much impact on me.

-The game has zero lag compensation. If I lagged during an area where I needed to aim with my mouse even for a few frames, my mouse would accelerate way too fast.
-No real replay value except to get achievements you might've missed.
-THIS IS NOT AN ADVENTURE GAME. At least not to me. You can't freely explore and go back to certain areas and a lot of it is story driven.

I still think this is an excellent game despite listing more cons than pros. Mainly because the pros are very huge factors as to why I think this game is good, whilst the cons are more just nitpicks on my part.
Posted 20 July, 2022. Last edited 20 July, 2022.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
47.8 hrs on record (46.2 hrs at review time)
Early Access Review
pretty spooky
Posted 27 November, 2020.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
9.5 hrs on record
Good sequel. First is still the best game though. I do like the choice between endings.
Posted 29 November, 2019.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
1.0 hrs on record
Early Access Review
fun times
Posted 29 June, 2019.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 people found this review helpful
0.9 hrs on record
lol
Posted 6 February, 2019.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
9 people found this review helpful
46.4 hrs on record (32.4 hrs at review time)
Best series. My childhood. I wish it would continue.
Posted 4 January, 2019.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 people found this review helpful
21.9 hrs on record (13.8 hrs at review time)
Best series. Literally ever.
Posted 4 January, 2019.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
< 1  2 >
Showing 1-10 of 16 entries