Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just holla i you ahve any questions.
--P
What I'd like to do is sound out your opinions on a updated 'rules of engagement' policy as the UN rule of not engaging other players can be a dangerous to the group and somewhat limited the Day Z experience. Here is what I propose.
1.The overall objective is to help players deemed to be not a threat and to aid them with food, drink & medical items.
2. Any groups of 3 or more who are positively identified as being comparatively armed as our group members are to be considered hostile. It is up to the group leader to decide based on the apparent armed status of the other group as to ambush or to elect a scout to monitor behaviour toward other players.
3. Anybody with clan tags who can be ID through bandwidth check where there is no other non clan tag in the vicinity should be considered hostile and is fair to engage.
What I would like to promote is a faster way for people like myself and others to learn squad play and how to shoot the various weapons in game whilst still making the game exciting to play.
Let me know what you think guys.