Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Just holla i you ahve any questions.
--P
What I'd like to do is sound out your opinions on a updated 'rules of engagement' policy as the UN rule of not engaging other players can be a dangerous to the group and somewhat limited the Day Z experience. Here is what I propose.
1.The overall objective is to help players deemed to be not a threat and to aid them with food, drink & medical items.
2. Any groups of 3 or more who are positively identified as being comparatively armed as our group members are to be considered hostile. It is up to the group leader to decide based on the apparent armed status of the other group as to ambush or to elect a scout to monitor behaviour toward other players.
3. Anybody with clan tags who can be ID through bandwidth check where there is no other non clan tag in the vicinity should be considered hostile and is fair to engage.
What I would like to promote is a faster way for people like myself and others to learn squad play and how to shoot the various weapons in game whilst still making the game exciting to play.
Let me know what you think guys.