Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I am reacting to the high increase in the rate of corruption associated with state funding of parties. In Belgium, parties are mainly financed by the State in proportion to their electoral results in the legislative elections. The aim is precisely to reduce corruption, and to avoid that political actors do not have too much lobbying power in relation to their democratic representativeness in society (the same thing exists for religious cults).
This does not completely prevent corruption, since some countries whose political parties are funded are also corrupt. It rather depends on the weight of the parties on the state
All countries inspired by the Napoleonic Civil Code have an independent state body whose officials are responsible for verifying and validating the national accounts of all administrations: "la Cour des Comptes" or "Court of Audits".