安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
2. I've seen that! I still have to do my ATS route downloads, one of the last things I'm doing before I start playing a lot more. Once I finish that and more snailing UKTS downloading, I'll be going through all my default DLC, but I will have the routes and be trying to keep an eye out for updates to them and scenarios for them. WCML South v5.3 is on my download agenda too, and Network ScotEast as well (though I do not have the overhead wires yet, I'm trying to time subscribing for getting the final version of the subscription routes).
The reason behind creating a patch would be to NOT have confusion over the different routes. If existing scenarios work on your version - something I may have to test - when creating a patch for his route would mean people can just run an installer that is provided and be able to get the updates even though his route is final. The existing scenarios would then still work on his route. But it sounds like he doesn't want to figure that out, so that's fine.