Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Pillars of Eternity and Tyranny are also good games from Obsidian. It's a bit of a bummer then to read that they especially fail with writing, cause that's the strong point from Obsidian.
the game is just flat, one dimensional and boring.
i was hoping for FONV, and got handed a generic borderlands.
Playing for 57 hours means he has a good grasp of the game and it's contents. Furthermore, it allows them to make statements that at least can be backed up from their experience.
I'd rather base my judgement on a review from someone who has played a game extensively, than a person who stopped playing after encountering one 'bad' thing about the game.
Btw, try looking up the definition of 'review'.