4 people found this review helpful
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 114.3 hrs on record (21.3 hrs at review time)
Posted: 20 Aug, 2016 @ 5:46pm

Early Access Review
After spending a few hours with 0.44 and 0.45, I'd say this was quite a letdown for an "early access" game being in development for two years now. The most disappointing though was when I had to realize the developers had broken already fixed features in an update. This and other bugs occourences clearly indicate that while they are amazing level/map desginers and modelers, there are major issues with their coding skills - which is quite strange as the cannibal AI workings are next to unbelievable.

If it were for the AI and graphics, I'd give a 10/10 for this being an indie piece. However the fact that I couldn't move on from the very very early stages of the game in co-op, because of all the physics engine bugs and the messed up inventory / rack inventory code, that can get messed up for whatever reasons, the only thing I can do is to return in a year and hope they've fixed this mess.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award