Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I suspect liberal centrists could do a better job of marketing Locke, Smith, Burke, Popper, Olsen, even Hayek. The appetite is there. I look at the recent general election in New Zealand and see around 30% swing vote to the center right, putting a coalition in office at about 64%. That's huge for a proportional rep system. I'm watching Canada and Aus closely too. Many voters are sick of the screaming and yelling, being told they're bad because of things they cannot change, being punished for past tolerances and none of this has paid off, given the state of the job market, cost of living, and interest rates.
The big change happened when pomo hit American politics and social mobilization. What a wonderful way to counter ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and the neoliberal triumphalists, to breathe new vitriol into stale partisan debates, get a job, a book deal, and a talkshow spot!