President Barney Sunders tarafından yazılan son incelemeler

Hmm...

Not sure how to say this. It was a pretty good game, but in *MY OPINION*, I did not enjoy it as much as others. That does not mean you will not like this game. I am just not a big fan of third person shooters. The story was pretty good, probably the best part. The shooting mechanics, ehh, again I'm not that wild over.

What I disliked the most, however, was what seemed like they padded the game down to extend the playing time by having infinite enemies spawn until you reached the next objective. Okay okay, I know i need to move there, but give me a dang couple of seconds before i move that doesn't require you to spawn 50000 more enemies.

And secondly, while I totally understand the decision and accept it as it's logical, I don't like that you are constantly having to switch weapons. Every wave of enemies uses different weapons, and ammo from one gun doesn't work on another. So, if you have a favorite gun, you won't use it since you can't hold much ammo, and will need to trade it out for a gun you like less 5 minutes later. And 5 minutes after that, you'll need to switch to another gun. But what if you don't NEED a sniper rifle since you're in close combat? Well, you should not have used all the ammo in your medium range gun. But what if you need a sniper rifle and all the enemies are dropping are shotguns with 4 rounds and a pistol that doesn't have much range? Well, you just push forward and try to not get killed so enemies stop spawning.

I mean, okay, i did enjoy the game, it had a good story and great graphics. But do I recommend it? Yes - if you like third person shooters and don't mind being forced to constantly change your weapons, sometimes ever few enemies, it's a great game. If you are like me and prefer first person shooters, but still can enjoy third person shooting games, I would still recommend it. It just wasn't for me.

I'd give it a solid 6.5-7/10. As far as my ratings are concerned, a 6 is for fans of the genre who will definitely like it. If you do not like third person shooters, then do not buy this game, as it will be unlikely to change your mind, UNLESS you are into a good story.

Pro:

No filler, all action. Great action. Great performance. Great graphics. Lots of gore and dead demons. Fast paced.

Con:

All DLC was for multiplayer. I want more single player!

99.666/100

Pretty good. If you liked Tomb Raider (2013) this is just as good, only better, maybe. Or maybe worse. I don't know. I like it.

good price, i'm too dumb to do much in it but at least I don't feel like i wasted money. Unlike some games...

You know what, I'm tired of it. Fudge it. I tried to like it, I really did. There is a LOT to like in this game. But the stupid f$#* difficulty just kills it. You die in one hit even when overcharged. There is no real skill. Just stupid dumb luck. WTF is with them throwing EVERYTHING they have at you in a wide open space being shot at from every direction and you just can't take them all down. Between reloading and switching weapons and throwing grenades, it's too much. There is no enjoyment in the shooting. Every other Wolfenstein game is better.

Runs pretty well on my system. No, I don't have a $120000 computer. Only *update* TWO crash(es) so far. I don't think the problem that people are having is related to not having a powerful enough computer, because they sure as heckfire (Groundhog Day reference) wouldn't use a piece of crap cpu like my 8350 to make the game. Granted, it's probably equal to what the PS4/XBone use, but it's still subpar.

You know, the more I play this the less I enjoy it.

*THE BAD*:

Holy heck fire, the difficulty is wild. Random insanely difficult spikes and cheap deaths. You spend an hour playing a level almost to the last commander and you get spotted. No problem normally, but then even after you kill 40 enemies, they keep spawning and spawning and suddenly heavy infantry and mechs show up pummeling you from every direction, killing you.

SURE WOULD BE A SHAME IF YOU GOT KILLED WHILE YOU HAD 110 HEALTH AND 25 ARMOR IN ONE HIT. SURE WOULD BE A SHAME GOSH DIDDLY IDDLY DOODILY DANG

Another big problem: You are in a firefight and need to regenerate health or run for cover. It's an unfamiliar area and even though you're running for a nearby safe spot, there;s ALWAYS something stupidly small in your way, something you get stuck on and get killed because it prevents you from moving. Not like a big box, but maybe "oh a metal plate is here" or a "tiny hole" that in the rest of the levels does not impede your movement. But in this big battlezone it sure as shirt does. YOU DIE.

You have to know EVERY bit of the area because some things that impede you rmovement in this area are only cosmetic changes in the rest of the game.

Another BIG friggin problem:

WHY THE HELLO IS IT SO DARK IN SO MUCH OF THE LEVELS? I understand darkness, but not black black. I have had to turn my brightness up, but even then it still looks dark grey and I can barely make anything out. And you don't have a flashlight. The only way you can light up the dark area is by shooting yoru guns. Which of course notifies enemies and wastes ammo.

Normally no problem, just resume from your last checkpoint. Except the last checkpoint was an hour or more ago and you have to replay the ENTIRE thing over again. And again. And again.

That is where the largest problem lies. Lack of checkpoints that make you replay the last hour or more.

Like the STUPID COURTROOM SCENE. HOLY MUCHBALLS.

Overall, I'd still recommend this game. Not as much as I would previously recommended.

Originally 8.5/10.
Before: 6.5/10.
Now: 3.5/10

Still fun, just frustratingly difficult from random spikes that really detracts from the overall experience.

Let the salty tears of the alt-right enhance your game experience by killing their buddies who are Nazi's.

*Honestly, if they fixed the difficulty, and made it so I did NOT have to turn the difficulty down to "Daddy, can I Play?" this would be a very good follow up. Still wouldn't be as good as the original but ♥♥♥♥ the difficulty. And it's not like Dark Souls where it's fair and you can beat it by learning. It's just unfair and uneven as ♥♥♥♥.

Win 7 x64
AMD FX 8350 at clock speeds
16 GB DDR3
RX 480

It's repetitive as fudge, but still incredibly fun. The main premesis is you drive around from one area on the map to another, and do the EXACT same things over again. Like, remove mines. There are like 7 areas, and each area has like 2-3 minefields. In order to progress or unlock stuff you have to remove mines from each area to reduce the threat.

It is still fun after the first 15-20 hours, but you'll find yourself playing when you feel like clearing a camp. I wouldn't recommend for a price over $20. Performance is great on my old rig (AMD FX 8350+RX 480 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3, Win 7x64).

It's a lot different than Dawn of War I, as you can't just build bases and spawn troops constantly. You're only allowed 4 units and can select which 4 at the beginning of the mission. It works pretty well, despite my initial hesitation. Graphics are still nice. Gameplay is great.

8.5/10

Silly and short, good fun and lots of humor. Get it for $5, and it's a win.

I'm torn between recommending this game and not.

The game is loads of fun, great fun. Hilarious all throughout. The reason I don't recommend it is the constant crashing. It's almost guaranteed to crash, and maybe even an OS level crash, resulting in a BSOD.

Download Sonic on an emulator, provided you own a copy of Sonic 1, 2, 3, or Sonic & Knuckles anyway. No DRM for that.

Took 2 weeks just for Denovo DRM.

Okay, after like a year I decided to update this. Yeah, I hate Denovo but bang dang your mom this game is for your health. It's great. Classic sonic. Some bosses and levels are really bad, and I wish they had special levels from Sonic 2 instead of just the orbs, or the Sonic CD style ones, but overall great game.

8.5/10