20 people found this review helpful
2 people found this review funny
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 2.2 hrs on record
Posted: 18 Apr, 2016 @ 11:43am
Updated: 18 Apr, 2016 @ 11:43am

So as someone who has never played Battlezone but is a huge fan of action-strategy games, you'd think this would've absolutely blown my mind. After about 2-3 hours, I'm not so sure. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's bad, as far as a remaster goes, this is how it should be done... mod support, working multiplayer, ability to download new maps for instant action, graphical enhancements etc... this is a damn good remaster. I think my problem is truly just expectations. As someone who has heard about how amazing this game is and how it's pretty much the best action-strategy game to be released, all I can do is compare it to Uprising: Join or Die and how different philosophies they both are.

Battlezone is slower, controls are floaty (because low gravity and hover tanks), units can be controlled directly and vehicles are all interchangeable with the player. You've also got 2 resources, scrap (metals) and pilots (nonrenewable). Scrap is gathered by scavengers from deposits all over the map and blowing up enemy units (or your own) creates scrap that can be scavenged and reused. Pilots are a nonrenewable resource, you need one for every unit you build. If the unit blows up, the pilot is ejected but he can also be killed thus losing him for good. If he makes it back to base, then your limit is not affected. It should also be noted that units have multiple weapon types and it doesn't seem like anyone is overly good against anyone else. Seems like numbers win the day in battles (from what I've played so far). This game also punishes you for your stupid teammates and makes you feel like you're just another soldier except you call in units.

Uprising: Join or Die on the other hand is more arcadey. It's fast-paced and operates more on a paper rock scissors format. Infantry beats building, Tank beats Infantry, Aircraft beats Bomber and Tanks, Bomber beats building, Building good against everything etc etc. It's more simplistic. Units cannot be directly controlled, they are called in and proceed to battle against any enemy within the area but after the battle can be recalled to gain back resources. Your tank is also your ultimate weapon, it can be upgraded with better weaponry and by the end of the game you'll be blasting away foes with about 12 different weapon types. Your tank can also divert power to 3 areas, shields, weaponry or speed... making you take more damage, deal more damage or zip around the battlefield at ridiculous speeds. Buildings are called in on pads rather than you essentially placing them whether you want (except for turrets). It should also be mentioned that Uprising is brutally hard, but not because your allies are retarded... rather you made a mistake and they capitalized on it. I could go on but I believe my point is clear.

Here we have two different action-strategy games that took the genre and walked opposite ways with it yet still remained true to a couple of different concepts (like having a command tank).

In summation, Battlezone 98 Redux is good for those who are looking for more of a slower paced, punishing game... Battlezone is your game. If you're looking for a twitch shooter that plays more like The Outfit, then Uprising: Join or Die is your game. I still believe this should be played by anyone who is a fan of action-strategy games!
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
9 Comments
IonHawk 23 Apr, 2016 @ 4:30pm 
Bah! I can do the first mission on normal difficulty easy! Then again, Battlezone is the only PC game I played from like 98 to 02 or something like that. xD

Also, you can increase number of pilots by building barracks with your constructor, just like in Blizzards RTSs. There is a limit of course but it is rather high.

So glad you liked it even though you never played it before. Considering how much games have changed in almost 20 years, this game proves once again that it is a classic.

But darnit, Battlezone is not slow paced. :P Have you completed the whole campaign yet or tried the multiplayer Strategy maps when commanders face of against eachother? Now those are tense.
CommissarBRO 19 Apr, 2016 @ 7:48pm 
@Westernra I wrote a long-winded review because I care about reviewing video games. I have over 150 reviews on Steam, most of which are long-winded. This game was something I was insanely interested to play because I've always been a huge A/RTS fan (Uprising Series, Savage, Civilizations at War etc etc). Battlezone is one of the grand daddy's of the genre (like uprising) so why would I not review and play it? While I can see how this game was mind boggling when it first came out, it's definitely not now. There are a lot of things wrong with the game that put a hamper on the fun. That doesn't make this game bad, it just isn't my style. So 8/10 seems to be a good number if I had to put one.
CommissarBRO 19 Apr, 2016 @ 7:48pm 
@Loomi I struggled to explain how I felt about this game but I think my summary is the best way I can describe it. It's good if you're looking for a slower-paced, more traditional Action-RTS experience. It's really difficult, so don't get frustrated if you do decide to pick it up. I failed the first mission about 4 times on medium difficulty because you have to "escort" a scavenger that has low health. My mind would be blown to see someone beat that mission on the highest difficulty... seriously. It's fun though, and there isn't anything quite like it so the experience is pretty unique.
Loomi 19 Apr, 2016 @ 11:02am 
This is actually the kind of review I was looking for, most other reviews are by people who played the game back in the olden days.
Proud Facebook Mom 18 Apr, 2016 @ 11:24pm 
And yet you took the time to write a long-winded review. That makes sense.
CommissarBRO 18 Apr, 2016 @ 5:05pm 
I'd still say it's more of an 8/10 haha
Proud Facebook Mom 18 Apr, 2016 @ 4:40pm 
Ah, so in other words it's your own fault for getting too hyped :] Always go in with an open mind, friend. Great game 10/10
CommissarBRO 18 Apr, 2016 @ 4:21pm 
It's true though hahaha like i enjoyed my experience with it but it just didn't feel like I thought it would
Jackhammer (Wholf) 18 Apr, 2016 @ 12:01pm 
So much effort xd