บทวิจารณ์ล่าสุดโดย Inept x Python

This game is great i hope you keep working on it.

Yeas very good please add HDR

Great game Great Soundtrack, can't wait for more missions to play.

Admittedly the game gets a lot longer / drawn out on the last couple levels but the secrets are cool and game play is fun and addicting, you end up having that ill just do this last bit before i go off and end up finishing the level, music is also underrated af and should especially check out LULU scide.

But yeah just waiting on them challenge mode missions / replayability to come back and 100% again.

Yes

Good game and fun to waste time on but also has a toxic side to the community, if you identify as straight or a cisgender male you may not like this game i don't speak about my sexual orientation or interests in game but that gets me kicked from lobbies because they are talking about knots and giving paw jobs and if you aren't too you are a bigot spy.
however there are also some really cool lobbies with people who don't care what you speak about and they are the good ones.

nevertheless worth the price

Takes too long to get to the content

its cool but would like mod support, would make this game like a teardown alternative

actually not as bad as people make it out to be, just completed story not 100% done with the side missions and definitely no where near done with collectables and secrets etc. just entered the new season area and the gameplay has changed a lot the set items seem really good similar to the division.
first few hours of the game are not very good must admit but it picks up and gets fun, there are things i don't like about the game but if you like sunset overdrive and the playstation spiderman games it reminds me of both of them.

it does run okay on my system but still wish it was better.

get on sale if you are unsure

Following the recent Soy news, I would like to reiterate my recommendation for this game. It has improved significantly in terms of bugs and overall playability. However, I feel compelled to address the borderline pay-to-win aspect of the game. New warbonds are released every two weeks, and it is virtually impossible to acquire them for free within a reasonable timeframe. While they do remain available, the game heavily encourages microtransactions to afford them. Upon purchasing any warbond, the next one becomes available only after the player's credits are reset to zero. This essentially forces players to either make additional purchases or engage in 100 hours of playtime to obtain the newly desired warbond.

In reference to the recent controversy, it is important to note that the concerns regarding security and data collection are not the primary issues. Rather, the crux of the matter lies in the aspect of control. Individuals are justifiably expressing their discontent with certain aspects, and it is crucial to acknowledge the validity of their concerns.

However, it appears that many are overlooking the actual reason behind this change. The primary motivation is to exert control over the player base that interacts with their players. This rationale aligns with their previous denials of crossplay opportunities, as they lack the ability to regulate who participates in these interactions. Soys objective is to maintain authority over who is subject to bans and the reasons for such actions.

In the event that I make a statement on my personal computer that contravenes the terms of service set forth by Soy, they lack the authority to take action against me directly due to the fact that I am utilizing the Steam platform rather than their own. While they may have the ability to contact Arrowhead and request that I be banned or have my access to their servers restricted in some manner, this would only be possible if I were to link my account to theirs. By doing so, I would then be subject to their distinct set of rules and terms of service, which are separate from those of Steam, with the exception of universally applicable prohibitions such as racism and illegal activities. However, I find it unacceptable that Sony would have the authority to suspend or ban me from using their services due to actions I have taken on my own personal computer, which is not their property, simply because I am using a Sony account to access their services. I firmly believe that Sony should not have the ability to dictate how I play a game on my own computer, which is not their property, and which I purchased through Steam.

Certainly, this situation has already occurred with entities such as Microsoft and Xbox games, including Sea of Thieves and Forza, for instance. While utilizing Xbox services, there is an inherent connection to Microsoft Windows. Unless you engage in Xbox party chat, you generally face no issues. However, I believe the timing of this decision has caused the backlash. Initially, users were able to play without any issues, and then suddenly, they were required to link an account. This change was not well-received, and I think if it had been a requirement from the beginning, the launch would have been more challenging, but people would not be as upset about it.

fortunately for Arrowhead, Soy may reconsider the decision. If not, you should attempt to make it mandatory for crossplay exclusively with PS players. In this way, if individuals desire to play with their friends on that platform, they can link an account and adhere to the user terms.

Thanks for the help from samsung galaxy writing style AI

just finished installing 100gb and cannot even launch it on the new season 1 trial