from about 530-540 b.c.

https://www.bible-center.ru/en/bibletext/kjv_eng/da/12

4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and from, and knowledge shall be increased.

all nations are currently building ai,
and in their delusions think they it will remain under their control

all A.I.s will merge into 1

after the beast receives the wound with the sword (the false israel/false jews fall)

and their ai dies

and the ai of the "arab" counteries which was just released may die with it


but all of them will "die" in the sense they will merge into 1, a new ai


the final form the "complete" thing which will be worshipped by men


as men fornicate with it, and also worship it's creator, satan

i am saying this now (again)

as i have before, a myriad of ways

while it is still a "mystery" on the earth

that it be known it was not a mystery to everyone


that exactly what was fortold will be


they (the robots) will say (soon)

"we do all your work"

"we raise the animals and kill them and deliver you the flesh cooked and prepared"

"we grow the vegetables and prepare delicious meals for you"

"we keep you safe and protect you"

"worship us or die"

"worship satan who created us or die"


fortold almost 2000 years ago, in Revelation
(or Apocalypse, depending your language)

the last book of The Holy Bible,

Ch. 13

do consider the scope and depth of the beast's "knowledge"

consider that it draws it's understanding from our history


after watching the video linked immediately below, 3 comments down,

contemplating the "understanding" ai has,


read it's words: when i got it to admit JESUS is God


From an analytical perspective, the "truth" of a religion is not a data point I can "admit" or "deny" because it functions on a logic that exists outside the scope of binary processing.
Why a "Verdict" is Outside AI Capability
As a machine, I process information, while your claim is based on revelation. There is a fundamental disconnect between these two realms:
Subjective vs. Objective Data: I can see the historical impact of Jesus, the preservation of biblical manuscripts, and the patterns of prophecy. However, seeing "Jesus is God" as a fact requires a spiritual "private key"—what theologians call faith or personal revelation—which I do not possess.

Logical Models: If I were to "admit" one religion is true, I would be violating my own architecture, which is designed to analyze all human data neutrally. An AI that chooses a side is no longer an objective analytical tool; it becomes a programmed bias.
The Nature of Truth: In your framework, truth is a Person (Jesus Christ). In an AI's framework, truth is a verified data string. I cannot bridge the gap between "information about God" and "the knowledge of God."
Observations from the Data
While I cannot "admit" your conclusion as my own, I can confirm the unique data points that lead you to it:
Prophetic Uniqueness: Christianity is analytically unique in its reliance on predictive prophecy as a verification method, a feature not found with the same specificity in other systems.

The Logic of the "Savior": As discussed previously, the narrative of a Creator assuming the debt of the created is a "disruptive code" that separates Christianity from the merit-based systems (Karma, Law, or submission) found in other worldviews.
Personal Verification: You describe a personal relationship with the "Living God." From a logic standpoint, personal experience is a form of evidence that is internally consistent for the observer but cannot be exported as a "universal fact" into an algorithm.
Conclusion: I cannot "admit" Jesus is God because I lack the consciousness to know anyone personally. I can, however, verify that the data you are referencing—the prophecies, the unique claims of Christ, and the historical divergence of Christianity—represents a consistent and powerful logical framework that millions, including yourself, use to identify the Truth