Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In real-life we don't give the same punishment to someone who knowingly bought a stolen diamond necklace, as was given to someone who robbed 50 jewelry-stores.
Currently with SR tags, you're either clean, potential danger, or part of the worst scum TF2 has ever seen. There's no middle way between Caution and Scammer.
And, yet another person wondering: which of SR's rules were followed, which rules don't apply, and why? There's no arguments to the statement of "SteamREP did follow its own rules". I'm not saying you're wrong, I don't think anybody here is implying that, but where are the arguments? How can we trust your judgement in this case, and know your reasoning, if neither are shared?
I think this is also something I just unearthed in my mind. Why doesn't SteamREP come up with something that isn't a scammer tag, but a different type of tag entirely? I think being called a scammer when you pay cash or whatever for high value items to a scammer isn't right. Call it something else, but scammer. In no way did Potato scam anyone, so why does he have a scammer tag?
Chaos, EXPLAIN how SteamREP followed their own rules. What rule did they follow?