Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Whichever maps he considers, he could still tie all of them into this one single campaign.
Think about it, makes sense, if length is that much of a concern...
As well as seriously considering porting more Counter-Strike maps.
Just see what happens combining them altogether into this current one first?
You'd cover all the bases.
Oh, and whatever ones that might not be campaign worthy could be for survival mode.
Someone did that with that Ravenholm campaign... the part with Father Grigori.
notice without mapping experience, though, so don't worry too much about this particular criteria.
Consider what I mentioned earlier about just adding the new maps into this campaign, though, it might work out in the long run and then you won't have to worry about short length any more. maybe it'd even be more convenient for you to just keep everything in this single campaign.
for example, there's a Parish texture mod, I forget the name of it...
and it carries over into other maps and just sometimes looks awkward.