Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden






Friend attacked rolled a 4 on the first roll, he then rolled a 1 for the effect roll, since he failed the 3+ roll would that mean he takes the damage from the fight or can he just keep rolling until he gets the 3+ 4+ and 5+ all in a row without any drawbacks. I think he was thinking damage is prevented to both player and monster while I was thinking just the damage to the monster is prevented. I viewed it as needing to roll a 2+ then 3+ then 4+ and lastly 5+ all in a row and if any of those failed you would take damage. He viewed it as the affect being seprate from the attack roll I think.