for example, if you draw a starting hand with 2 or less land, you can predict that you wont draw a land within your first 3-4 turns and be right an overwhelming % of the time. conversely, if you draw 5+ land you can expect to draw land 2 out of your first 3 cards almost every time.

in addition, the game RNG absolutely *loves* to double-up on cards. you might only have 2 copies of a card in a 100 card deck, but if you see one, you can bet youll be seeing the other very soon, if not immediately after.

it is the stringiest mess of an RNG ever made, and the people responsible for it should be barred from game dev for life.

the RNG for this game is probably the worst ive ever seen. its so bad, that its *predictably* bad.

losing, lose, loss, lost

loosing, loose, loosely

that was the main problem ya

What I cant stand are those salty players that somehoew freeze/pause the game for 5-10min when they know they are loosing to make you quit.... I see the bug being reported everywhere but its still happening. -_- .... Oh well at least I can catch up on some work, or e-mails cause I aint losing to people like that.

I've been playing the game for a while now and I cannot understand why players seem to think that an essentially free to play game would not be rigged by the developer to "show the benefits" of parting with some of your hard earned cash to improve your game. If I have not played for a while I win game after game with ease and my draws are incredible. If I win game after game I seem to draw and utter shambles mulligan after mulligan. It's essentially playing on all free to play games in my eyes... get them hooked and they will part with their cash.

The thing is (and people can deny it so as not to be disqualified from tournaments but it's still true): No-one in real life randomizes their decks like a CPU does. The code's aim is maximum entropy. No amount of prime number pile shuffling is ever going to get close to that level of entropy. There is always some semblance of order no matter how disordered a 'shuffled' deck may lok at first glance.

>draw five lands and two 1CMC
>only draw lands

mana flooding should'nt be that much of an issue unless you're playing agro.

sorry, I meant "You wrote "Confirmation bias in a nutshell" wrong"
My bad ^^
But yeah, it gets annoying