Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem









The inconsistency is grotesque. An armorer dominates matches, defines strategy, and he shoves them into tier B as if no one had any eyes. The following month, the same armorer miraculously becomes S+, without any patch changes. And of course, all this is accompanied by the shallowest possible justifications, such as “I don't feel he's that strong”. Do you? Is that a tier list or aura reading?
But the worst thing is the pose. When someone questions him, he responds with that arrogance typical of an influencer who thinks his opinion is absolute truth.
A inconsistência é grotesca. Um blindado domina partidas, define estratégia, e ele enfia no tier B como se ninguém tivesse olhos. No mês seguinte, o mesmo blindado milagrosamente vira S+, sem nenhuma mudança no patch. E claro, tudo isso vem acompanhado das justificativas mais rasas possíveis, do tipo "não sinto que ele é tão forte". Sente? Isso é tier list ou leitura de aura?
Mas o pior é a pose. Quando alguém questiona, ele responde com aquela arrogância típica de influencer que acha que a opinião dele é verdade absoluta.