İndirmek için abone ol
oh well you can just dismiss this one

a holocaust is a Jewish ritual involving sacrifice by fire based on pre-world war 2 dictionary's

I don't know how slaughtering about 100.000 people from a population of 1.5-2 million is not considered a "slaughter on a mass scale." Though if you mean that it's way of perpetration was not by fire or nuclear war then OK, i guess? That makes the Jewish holocaust not a holocaust as well because it wasn't done specifically using fire or nuclear weapons.

Also the Zionist Paramilitaries? Do you know who formed IDF after the creation of Israel? The literal Jewish paramilitary terrorist groups like Haganah were directly converted into the IDF. What's even more interesting is that one of the Israel's prime ministers, namely Menachem Begin, was once the leader of an "extremist" terrorist group called Irgun, which perpetrated the King David Hotel bombing that killed more than 100 British people.

also it want the IDF, it was Zionist Paramilitaries because the British Mandate didn't have an army.

Its not a Holocaust, its still a tragedy that those people were displaced but a Holocaust is, "destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war." according to Oxford

No, of course I meant the IDF. As if you have actually read my comment you would've known who perpetrated the Nakba aka the Palestinian Holocaust.

Who is the most moral army in the world? The Turks?

Then "the most moral army in the world" started a genocide and ethnic cleansing campaign that is called "Nakba" which killed more than 75.000 people and displaced 1 million people from their lands.

I don't know anything but your ancestors having "moving over" a land 3000 years ago does not give you the right to invade a territory in the 21st century at all. What you are saying right now is justifying the Russian invasion of Ukraine and many more occupations that we deem "illegal" in the modern history.

The British wanted Palestinian cooperation for establishing a mandate in Palestine and promised them independence just like how they promised Saud family and Syria/Iraq independence. But unlike Iraq and Saudi Arabia, British promised Jews the same land as well. Then what? British started dumping all the "unwanted men" of Europe in Palestine, then those unwanted men started creating terrorist groups like Irgun and Haganah. Then those same terrorists fought against British as well. British, just like always, said that "screw it" and got the fuck out of there except with leaving all their armament for Jews.

The UN chartered both the Israeli and Palestinian lands because both can't get along (Palestinians seem to like to play the Victim card too hard.) And despite this wasn't evven Palestinian Land because Palestine was first made as a British mandate in 1917 after the inevitable downfall of the Ottoman Empire. And Israel or at least the Kingdom of Judah/ Kingdom of Israel existed WAY before Palestine. And the Caanites existed wayyy before the Palestinians and Israelites. So it's not even Palestinian land it's Israeli land that was given to the Palestinians because clearly they don't know how to behave in other countries. (Kuwait, Jordan and Egypt...)

Let's say H@mas is the source of all evil, then how do you explain West Bank? There is a secular left-leaning government ruling in West Bank without any Hmas or anything, yet we still see the destruction caused by Israel, inch by inch, meter by meter they are slowly invading the Palestinian soil like some sort of virus.

History is such a thing that when you look at it in a broader perspective, you see that what the mainstream media tells you as "the history" is just a crooked fragment of what actually happened.