Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I use Vortex for Skyrim AE, but that's only due to how finicky that game is with modding. MO2 gets used for Skyrim LE, basically everything else is either NMM or Manual on my end. (Vortex is horrible imo. But when needs must... lol.)
In my experience, it has to do with the system. MO2 is horrible for modding and launching Oblivion, or any game from before 2010. MO2 is made more for modern systems, while Wrye Bash is made for older. Personally, I use NMM for Oblivion, Fallout New Vegas, and a few older games. But I launch them directly from Steam. (Even if Load Order gets messed up that way, they run better for me. Even NMM has problems with launching the game in my experience.)
MO2 works great for Skyrim, and most games made after 2010 as it was designed for more modern systems.
I'm trying to pick modding as a hobby back up, so much as changed since I was last doing it. This is why I am curious about your perspective on MO2 being easier to make mistakes with and being more convoluted.