Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Treat the above diagram as an example roof. Place a platform at each point in the diagram. The benefit of this construction over the aforementioned one is that the bug A.I cannot decide to cross your roof. For example, if your roof extends too far in any direction, the bugs could decide that it is more efficient to cross the roof than to go around it, nullifying your barricade. By using the triangular, non-contiguous method, the bugs will more consistently avoid the path blocked by the platforms.
Hope this helps, rock and stone!