Asenna Steam						
					
				
				
									kirjaudu sisään
											 | 
						kieli
						
																																					简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
																													繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
																													日本語 (japani)
																													한국어 (korea)
																													ไทย (thai)
																													български (bulgaria)
																													Čeština (tšekki)
																													Dansk (tanska)
																													Deutsch (saksa)
																													English (englanti)
																													Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
																													Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
																													Ελληνικά (kreikka)
																													Français (ranska)
																													Italiano (italia)
																													Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
																													Magyar (unkari)
																													Nederlands (hollanti)
																													Norsk (norja)
																													Polski (puola)
																													Português (portugali – Portugali)
																													Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
																													Română (romania)
																													Русский (venäjä)
																																							Svenska (ruotsi)
																													Türkçe (turkki)
																													Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
																													Українська (ukraina)
																									Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
							
						
 
											 
													




 
			





Friend attacked rolled a 4 on the first roll, he then rolled a 1 for the effect roll, since he failed the 3+ roll would that mean he takes the damage from the fight or can he just keep rolling until he gets the 3+ 4+ and 5+ all in a row without any drawbacks. I think he was thinking damage is prevented to both player and monster while I was thinking just the damage to the monster is prevented. I viewed it as needing to roll a 2+ then 3+ then 4+ and lastly 5+ all in a row and if any of those failed you would take damage. He viewed it as the affect being seprate from the attack roll I think.