Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español – España (spanska – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spanska – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (portugisiska – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisiska – Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
The lower the downforce the higher the ballast. :)
Hope that answers it (ish) for you :)
So the trick is to only add as much ballast you need to the point of the car being loose in the corners then I would look at the suspension to counteract it.
1) I've probably tried every sensible approach. different wing settings + odd ballast so I have seen the difference. and my answer...
Depends on the track ha!
Generally I always run 6-8 ballast as I find ths helps with turn-in but that also means I can run a MUCH lower downforce setup with the right suspension and geometry settings. Wing settings fluctuate between balanced "3-3" or and unbalanced "3-4" for example. Balanced wings I would run on a circuit that had hard breaking zones, more slow corners and not long flowing bends (Canada/Baku). An unbalanced wing setup I would use on tracks that have fast sweeping bends or corners where quick changes of direction are needed (Japan/China).
Yeah I have the same in practice sessions sometimes. It would show me as 17th fastest for instance then I'd qualify in the top 5, just a weird game thing I think that the AI isn't effected by track conditions throughout the weekend until qualifying, fuel is always a factor too.
2- Does running an aggressive rake like in real life work better? (2/5 or 3/6)