安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The AKM is to give the player a taste of that, but to feel worn down and weaker, as to enhance the feeling of vulnerability that the Canals put on the player, being chased by a KA-27 and all that. In essence, the AKM is a gimmicky taste of later power, but its clear that it isn't quite there, and I unironically like it for that.
(Plus it feels like Star Fox 64's blaster mechanic and I wish UMP45 could make a version that charges up like Star Fox's blasters. That would be a cute reference.)
I think the firing dynamics make more sense when you consider that the AKM is an early game weapon found in the C17 Canals while you're being chased by Metrocops.
I think the AKM was meant to feel like something like the other Assault Rifles, but to feel more "rickety" and worn down, a bridge between the early game and what's to come later. the HL2 Beta may have had a big weapon roster, but at several points, the Beta was supposed to strip the player of guns. There was a clear weapon hierarchy in play along with some of the specialized weaponry you could obtain.
The AKM in RTBR, if RTBR is to follow the Beta's hierarchy, likely is supposed to be the bottom tier Assault Rifle. Worn and Rusted from time in the Canal's conditions, the AKM is meant to give the player a taste of what's to come, but not quite "there"
It's sort of unusual, and it throws you off a bit because now you're having to deal with "restarting" the burst after 5 or so rounds in order to keep up with the enemy.