4
已評論
產品
0
帳戶內
產品

GreenGuse6 最近的評論

目前顯示第 1-4 項,共 4 項
37 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
6 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
2
總時數 446.7 小時 (評論時已進行 408.5 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
When it's fun and you're doing well the game is extremely fun, but the the save system really does ruin the experience and make this game so frustrating to play. I will never understand why the devs don't add a manual save option. Will also probably never be completely finished which is a shame.
張貼於 2023 年 7 月 31 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
6 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 37.8 小時
It's really frustrating. The game, when playing well, is actually very fun, but it's just so sloppy. The UI reminds me of an iPad game (not in the good way), especially compared to the clean and well done CoH2 UI. Performance during battles is passable but not good, especially for the level of graphics this game features compared to CoH2. Performance during the Total War battle map side is atrocious. Total War battle maps are 100 times nicer looking with much more intricate animations (like birds, smoke, etc.) but run fine. My frames drop to 5-10 on the battle map with absurd load times. No excuse for a game in 2023 to be barely playable in the battle map when Total War has had steady(ish) performance since Rome Total War. I've also had a couple of random crashes.
There are aspects of the game I really like. All the current units feel clean and well balanced. Vehicles are clean to drive and each vehicle feels like it serves a distinct purpose, but infantry is also fun and necessary to use. I love using artillery support in this game. It feels very powerful and the physics system in this game is awesome, calling in naval guns or 305mm artillery is devastating and satisfying as ♥♥♥♥. AI feels a little easy but I haven't tried it on harder difficulties (I also like to win, to be completely honest). The North Africa campaign was very fun even if I didn't give a ♥♥♥♥ about the boring ass story (the CoH2 Soviet story was way better). I also like the idea behind the battle map and it's definitely an improvement from the CoH2 Ardennes Assault battle map.
But yeah. The game is definitely just not finished. Factions are fun but faction rosters are way too small. Perfomance is really really bad. The campaign map is a good start but painfully outdated compared to say, Total War. Honestly a midpoint between the two games would be the perfect WW2 RTS. Maybe a year or two from now the devs will have finished the game and this review will be different but as of right now it's a don't buy unless it's on sale or you have money to burn.

Update: I went back and replayed the entire CoH2 Soviet campaign and it really just cemented how much worse this game is. While small QoL improvements are nice, performance, gameplay, enemy AI, story and bugs are atrocious compared to CoH2. Even the graphics aren't that much better, certainly not what I would expect from a game made almost 10 years later. For reference, Rome 2 Total War and Attila Total War were 2 years apart and the (already very good) R2 graphics were noticeably worse. 2 YEARS VERSUS 10! Absurd.
張貼於 2023 年 7 月 26 日。 最後編輯於 2023 年 8 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 160.4 小時 (評論時已進行 94.3 小時)
♥♥♥♥ off Rockstar, ♥♥♥♥ off Take Two you sleazy P.O.S.
張貼於 2017 年 6 月 16 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 74.4 小時 (評論時已進行 7.1 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
It was more Bromazing than I Broxcpected... Brod bless the Broferences, since they are Broeutifal...
張貼於 2015 年 7 月 2 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前顯示第 1-4 項,共 4 項