Recent reviews by MikeyMouse

Recently I posted a review on how disappointed I am of this game and it's developer's for making it unplayable (litrally unplayable for me, I couldn't start it up). But after being able to run it and reading a lot of other reviews on Steam, I'd like to revise my opinions. A lot of people have said that the game doesn't look that good and has stuttering issues on their high end PCs. And I've seen some go as far for Rocksteady to demand all future DLC to be released for free for wasting their time and money. I can play this game on an 840m Graphics Card at about 20 frames per second with some minor texture issues and cutscene audio desync. Is that perfect? No. Should the game have been released in this state? No. But is the game playable? Yes, it is. Just because the game doesn't look like it was advertised doesn't make it a bad game in it of itself. If people stopped focusing on what's missing and start seeing what's actually there, I think they'll genuinely enjoy the game more. It was a good thing that WB pulled the game from the store to perfect it, and they admittedly do deserve some backlash for not making sure the game ran as expected before launching. But the game shouldn't be hated on just because of some not "next gen" performance issues. I gave the game a chance, and I am enjoying my experience so far.

tldr; This game isn't as horrendous as people make it out to be. Stop focusing on what isn't there and start focusing on what is.