12
已評論
產品
200
帳戶內
產品

vfm 最近的評論

< 1  2 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 12 項
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 6.5 小時
Whole game takes 6 hours. It's action on rails. It's ok.
張貼於 2024 年 11 月 21 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 15.3 小時
Nope.
張貼於 2024 年 5 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 50.4 小時 (評論時已進行 42.9 小時)
I'm not even into RTS that much, but this game has consumed me. What a gem!
張貼於 2024 年 2 月 15 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 36.1 小時 (評論時已進行 30.8 小時)
A worthy successor to JA2, finally. In a long time I wasn't so positively surpised by a game.
張貼於 2023 年 7 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 83.3 小時 (評論時已進行 25.7 小時)
It's fantastic, must be one of the best release Paradox has had ever. It covers all the basics I expected, looks like a great base to build out from.

If you expect railroading or combat micromanagement stay with HoI4 and don't forget your Hitler mods and Nato counters.
張貼於 2022 年 11 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 13.8 小時 (評論時已進行 10.7 小時)
I absolutely wouldn't recomend you to buy this game at it's full asking price. For $10 at humble bundle it's good value.

It's been a while from release and the game still feels pretty bare bones. Base game doesn't have any scenarios, map generations feels very samey, over just a few presets,

The DLC model is terrible (so far, R&F looks promising), paying serious money for literally no new features and very modest amount of content. $40 for 8 new civs and some filler content is terrible value, especially compared to R&F which for $30 promises 8 new civs and actual features.

I've found the music in the game horrendous. It so bleak compared to Civ V it's painful.

I used to play Civ V on epic and marathon speeds but with Civ VI it's impossible. It's just so - painfully - slow. First 4X game that plays better on smaller maps and quicker speeds.

It's not the best Civ game. It's not the best "recently" released 4x game. At full price you are better of with one of Paradox or Creative Assembly games.

On the flipside: I really like the graphic design. The new tech system is fun. I love the change to builders.

To sum up - it's not a terrible game, it's just terrible value.
張貼於 2018 年 1 月 25 日。 最後編輯於 2018 年 1 月 25 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 64.3 小時 (評論時已進行 60.0 小時)
What's there to say, it's civ. Works very well on modern iGPU's.
張貼於 2018 年 1 月 13 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
8 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
9 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 0.6 小時
Once you get the game to run it turns out you were better off when it didn't work.

Completely arcade-y mechanics, swinging at over 200 kph in a pickup truck over marshlands and vegetation.

Requires two DRM's, you HAVE to play with Steam and uPlay on.

Performance on intel HD 620 was acceptable.

Refund after half an hour. You are better off playing TDU2 or the free Forza.
張貼於 2018 年 1 月 2 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 79.8 小時 (評論時已進行 17.8 小時)
9/10, because Victoria 3 still isn't announced.
張貼於 2016 年 11 月 24 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
4 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 11.0 小時
It's still really good, and it's surprisingly still supported, lately it was patched up to work well on W8 and W10.
張貼於 2016 年 11 月 24 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 12 項