Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
He’s making a layered critique of symbolic identity, specifically targeting the pride flag as a case study in what he sees as performative self-branding. His core gripe is with people who adopt symbols like the pride flag not as a reflection of earned, complex identity, but as a shortcut to moral legitimacy or social belonging.
So when someone wears the pride flag, they’re not just expressing queerness; they’re aligning with a broader ideological movement that has become intolerant under the guise of empathy. He explicitly affirms queer expression—but he’s rejecting the idea that identity should be flattened into a flag, especially one that’s been co-opted by what he sees as shallow or coercive moral narratives.
He sees this kind of symbolic signaling as willfully ignorant, and contrasts it with his own stance: personal, indulgent, maybe even provocative—but at least honest and unmasked. Ultimately, he’s calling for symbolic integrity.
When you choose to identity yourself with flags/symbols/groups known for their ignorance and intolerance, despite of your individual standing, especially when intolerance is masked as moral righteousness, that speaks to either ignorance, or naivety.
Don't get me wrong, I won't pretend I'm righteous in what I do, it is a personal thing, I find satisfaction in it. But I don't hide my cards behind indignity and then claim empathy.