Yeah, I use Arch Linux. What, you thought I was going to settle for some bloated, hand-holding, virus-riddled excuse of an operating system like Windows? I didn't 'install' Arch; I built it. I manually partitioned the disk, configured the bootloader, and did everything from scratch—no automated nonsense. While you're over there getting interrupted by pop-ups and endless updates, I’m in the terminal, compiling my own kernel from source, optimizing performance, and running my system with nothing but the bare essentials. Arch doesn’t babysit me like Windows does. I manage my own dependencies, roll my own updates, and make sure everything works as it should—no proprietary software, no shady telemetry, no pointless bloatware. I installed a minimal window manager because GUIs are for people who need to be coddled. My package manager (Pacman, look it up) doesn’t have half the problems your Windows ‘store’ does. And let’s not even talk about security. Arch doesn’t rely on a fat, outdated OS model where vulnerabilities pile up. I control every piece of software that runs on my machine. You enjoy your restart-for-every-update world, while I’ll be over here with my rolling release system, constantly updated, constantly improving, and not slowing down one bit. So yeah, I use Arch. It's the only way to actually understand your system, not just be a passive user waiting for the next update to break everything