Timbo legutóbbi értékelései

The Warscape engine was built for Empire and Napoleon, it was stretched for Shogun, and handles Warhammer fantasy in a special way, but it absolutely does not do realistic melee combat well. This is one of the reasons why other historic TW titles pale in comparison to Rome I and Medieval II.

Creative Assembly should have made another Empire TW, because that's where Warscape shines.

Amazing all the campaign features this game has that have since been dropped from total war games. They are sorely missed. It also runs amazingly well compared to newer TW games. Upping of the unit sizes with mods can attain playable 40,000 person battles, which is not possible on new TW games using my pc. Turn times are only a couple seconds.

This older TW game engine is far more capable than what CA currently build games with and Feral is doing a great job giving us the tools to make great mods.

An EA game with solid and functional mechanics.

Has good sense of adventure. Map generation is believable. Tools and weapons are well-thought out and balanced between each other. Building is lovely, with the tools for extensive creativity provided. Physics play a significant role throughout. Sailing is immersive and not over-powered, but still very necessary. Combat is simple but functional. Dodging and blocking are very viable. Netcode has been more than adequate. View distance is short and framerate can be harsh.

This game is worth $45.

Once upon a time there was a group of devs who decided they would upgrade their engine to their longstanding successful game series. They poured their little hearts into their work and ended up with a masterpiece that, despite a few kinks, beautifully recreated architecture, lighting, and animation the likes of which gaming has never seen before.

Then came along the big bad publisher who said, "You gotta pump this out, like now. And by the way, we need 5 different in-game currencies and ways for the player to spend $$$ and download our ♥♥♥♥♥♥ app if they want to have more fun." And so the beautiful game became tainted. The plebian masses and the bourgeoisie could not see the beauty hidden behind the incompatibility crashes and microtransactions that plagued the game at launch. They groaned, complained, and wrote many a negative review. Rightfully so.

Then the publisher turned back to developer and said, "WTF is this mess you guys made? You are garbage and so is your new engine. Go back to the old one and never run this new one again. Also make it a RPG lol." And that is how a unique, story-driven, historically based game series became an endless slog of cartoony fetch quests and level gating fantasy BS.

Thought I wasn't going to like stupid looking armors and far-fetched fantasy. But I did.

The greatest game in its genre. Play Forged Alliance Forever. The community is still going strong.

A true sandbox experience with potential not yet reached.

Mount and Blade is and always has been great fun for its role-play immersion and boundless freedom. The feeling of owning and managing your person/party/castle/kingdom is unmatched by any other series. Combat is fun, but with time becomes repetitive, simple, and stale. The nature of the battlefield does not lend to tactics so well as dedicated RTS games, meaning it is difficult to alter outcomes of battles beyond gaining more manpower or troop quality. Modding potential has always been a massive bonus for Mount and Blade games, which Bannerlord currently lacks due to constant updates, each one breaking all mods and bringing new curious restrictions by the developers. So long as Taleworlds keeps this up, we will not get the Mount and Blade game we want. That is the nature of early-access.

This game is currently worth $30

An interesting premise that would be implemented well if it weren't for an unintended broken movement system that is abused and encouraged by experienced players. It's cancer for anyone new.

A failed attempt at a semi-realistic WWII shooter.

PS gets a lot right. The sound design is great. The atmosphere is immersive. The tanks feel and behave like tanks. The bones for a great game are there. Despite these things, there is an insistence by the developers to render the game chaotic and arcade with free mobility of spawn points in maps that play out more like Vietnam than they do WWII with weapons that are so extremely accurate and easy to use that it is near-impossible to miss or be missed. You'll find the enemy team arriving at your non-cappable flags long before your own team does. You'll find yourself dying in 1-shot to ironsight snipers 400 meters away. There is 0 semblance of battle line and team-play suffers for it, as it becomes more effective for random soldiers to spread about and hide rather than group-up and die to one man with a laser who cannot be spotted. PS takes goofed spawning mechanics, adds stupid accurate gun-play from common FPS shooters, and then jams them both into jungle-esque maps.

It hurts because all of these things are fixable.

Worth $0

First there was KotOR. Then Mass Effect 2. Next was Skyrim. Now, there is the Witcher 3. God looked down at these things and, behold, it was very good.