Recent reviews by Keith Rodney

Should be called "Only if this game didn't suck". Boring, lackluster, and a waste of time.

doooo it

Typical ♥♥♥♥♥♥ arcade baseball vs an actual sim. The soundtrack is the most annoying garbage music I've ever heard. Don't recommend if you're planning on spending over $5 on this polished turd.

15/10 The best Hockey Sim I've ever used,

i give it 5 salami's out of 4 corks.

if you don't own this by now, you should.

As a huge fan of the "Ghouls n' Ghosts" series, I can say this has some decent dificulty to it, but then went the extra mile. The addage of getting the story line by reading item descriptions, and even the way the leveling system does with that as well is pretty dang sweet. 5/5

Hands down, best FPS I've played in the last decade.

I give it a 6/10. Clunky with the button response (Using Xbox One controller, Xbox 360, and 8bitdo) to the point that you've got to anticipate your moves a few seconds before you do it, similar experience to playing with lag on any of the EA games. So this means NO one timers (booo!). The option to deke without doing 3-4 hits before is a bit strange feature. The game does crash EVERY time I close it, and have to use task manager, and reboot my pc if I want to play it again. The game crashing warants a -2 points on my scale, and the other issues -1 per., nothing that can't be fixed with a few patches ;) ;)

The game itself is really great, really nailed the old school feel. The story (only 5 games in so far) is a solid 10/10, the team getting into a fight with santa at the christmas signing had me laughing! Also, Jack Goff lol

I purchased this game the other day thinking it'd be a great idea, but boy was I mistaken. I started a season as the 1997 colorado avalanche and with only making some minor tweaks to the team (trading picks for players...1st and 2nd round picks for roenick... 3rd.4th.5th and 6th plus a prospect for scott stevens.. what a joke!!!) I finished off the season in 2nd last with patrick Roy having a .776 save percentage, joe sakic have under 20 points in over 60 games, as well as forsberg AND roenick. I just don't get how you can have some players rated the way they are and just not have them preform properly. I've been creating teams/players of eras and doing so on the Ea Sports NHL games, with doing analisys of stats within the era (I'm a bit obsessed). But I'd rather waste my time doing that than to have this garbage atempt. Where do I go to get my $15.00 back?