Recent reviews by Jad

The fluid melee combat in this game makes it extremely fun. Great content, tools to play with, and very thrilling fights. Just look at how fun the melee gameplay is, and it's even better when you actually try it yourself. Learning how to master your tools is really needed

Still the best battlefield 13 years later

This game is good but it definitely needs a tiny bit of technical work.

1. Crashes and better optimization

2. (DMZ/W2.0 specific) Looting is wonky, make it where you can see things on the ground like in PUBG. Plenty of times things either go under the ground/an object, or you can't pick up contracts sometimes

3. Undo the armor piercing ammo doing no extra damage to armor update on Nov 22nd. I mean it's literally in the name, it pierces armor. Either that or change their name to wall penetrating rounds or bit of extra vehicle damage rounds. Armor piercing is literally in the name. You can also rework bullet velocity to do a tiny bit more damage to flesh at closer ranges to make armor piercing less useful for anything other than wallbanging, breaking vehicles, or breaking armor plates in wz2.0/dmz. It's reasonable, and make the bullet velocity negative more prevalent if it's that bad or make the extra armor plate damage lower. Completely removing it breaks all sane thinking/reasoning.

(snipers/spr can't one shot, at least them being able to break all armor plates so the secondary weapon can be used to wipe someone out is logical, the game is pretty much you use a brainless low recoil, high dps AR/smg to win in warzone because of armor helping protect them)

Keep the aim assist despite bad PC players crying. You have a huge advantage on the PC. learn and adapt instead of complaining. This game is good because it's not as hold w +m1 / slide and fly around holding left click like the other ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ones (in good lobbies you'll get ♥♥♥♥♥♥ trying that unless you use utilities smartly). It's got great potential because of that.

The game is good. A tiny bit of work and it'll be great, maybe even one of the best cods released in a long time. It's fun playing a more tactical / aim rewarding and recoil compensating version of COD, and it is closer to the old MW2/BO1 that so many people only really liked COD for. Developers were smart to bring that back amongst many other tiny things old COD players liked.

Campaign/singleplayer no complaints (silly bugs sometimes), I haven't enjoyed a singleplayer campaign or been interested in the story for a while, this one beat my expectations.

And remove all point blank, kill from behind, and hipfire kills (especially hipfire on snipers/marksmans) camo challenges already. Those are so annoying to get against good players. It feels like you have to face clueless people to get them.

This game is great and features BC2 content/gamemode, my favourite battlefield game ever. Really awesome, it lacks a few features such as being able to change squads (it says it in the game you can but it currently is a bit bugged on release), and no VOIP, but it does have server browser and really good new content not seen in other Battlefield games. Looking* forward to singleplayer being added in the future possibly. And it does feature quite a few bugs/glitches in the game, but other than those factors, this game is crazy in potential and capabilities compared to so many games, and it's quite fun if you aren't a manchild / could be a bit patient or constructive / willing to help.

The negative reviews are just whiny people who lack patience and put too much faith without really knowing that games like this are not easy to produce. I don't think they realise negative reviews spam with whining / non-constructive feedback detriments a product.

I'm hoping if you negatively reviewed this product, and it actually does get fixed/patched in the future, you reconsider either changing your review to something more constructive and/or a positive review.

Edit: Yeah this game should've been released in a better state to be very honest. Reputation matters lmao. Look at how positively seen Elden Ring was.

Pure masculinity game. Real men play this ♥♥♥♥.

As of Feb 2021, this game is now a lot better because kakaogames is gone; as well as additions like Seasonal characters to slingshot new players to levels where it's easier to reach high gear. This game is not P2W; but spending an extra like $20 or so will help you with convenience (for example, cooking time reduced if you like that lifeskill, pets will loot for you when you're killing monsters, reducing the time needed to pick stuff up, you can only have 5 pets, and can get them free from events every month. Some people can't wait that long, so in that case you spend a few bucks and enjoy the game more) That's just to help convenience in progression if you like to grind monsters to get your gear. PAID gear DOES NOT help anyone in PvP in anyway; it does not make anyone have an advantage over you in the end. No extra stats or any weapons/gear at all exist for real life money. So this game is really really good in that aspect.

school memories

This game is good, it's developed by a single person and is worth a try. It's fun and has some good elements to scare you like the radio. Recently updated to include an incentive for PvP so it's not necessarily purely grinding like warframe or other games that get boring after a week without any endgame or pvp incentives

A classic very nostalgic, fun and good game originally made by Three rings; SEGA. It's still great to get into, and the new company is going hard at keeping it up with new stuff constantly. Was still way better before imo though.

If you can't win Hell On Earth on your first launch of the game you suck.




git gud