1 person found this review helpful
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 24.7 hrs on record (11.9 hrs at review time)
Posted: 25 Sep @ 10:59pm
Updated: 25 Sep @ 11:05pm

Early Access Review
Final Verdict: 78/100

Player Experience:
I played the game at 3440x1440 on Ultra settings and averaged 105.5 FPS with occasional dips and stuttering during conflicts where multiple vehicles or mechs exploded at one time. I did have some freezing and hangups when interacting with the menus at times.

I only encountered some minor bugs or odd issues which included being stuck on terrain (x2), falling through the map (x1), AI tracking and chasing through multiple walls and pursuing after breaking multiple sight lines. The enemy AI does need vastly more work as it does a significant amount of funneling, stopping, hanging up, waiting for reform into a formation, breaking formation and freezing in a single area rather than patrolling.

The overall feel on the game is heavy and slow, from character movement to camera control everything feels slow and heavy which I disliked initially but after a few hours I had easily adjusted to it. The gunplay isn't bad but does leave something to be desired at times it does feel exceptionally hollow and bland for a large number on weapons.

The water system is a great idea, awfully executed. As there really isn't anything that you do with the water besides have some unlock requirements for upgrading your innards (base/hub) in its current state it just feels pointless and unrewarding to interact with.

There a numerous elements in place that exist but feel very raw, I appreciate them existing but feel it would have been better to leave them excluded until they were more fleshed out and completed.

The atmosphere, art style, music, and concept are unique and beautiful. I can't fault anything from the art department of this game.

I have high hopes because the devs have talked the talk, I'm hoping they can walk the walk.

Average: 75-84 (75-84%)
Performance or gameplay meets the passing mark but remains average in numerous areas.
There are areas that could be improved to enhance the gaming experience.
Cautiously Recommended - ✔

Gameplay Experience (19/25)

Intuitive Controls - Easy to use.
☐ Very Difficult (+1)
☐ Difficult (+2)
☐ Moderate (+3)
☐ Easy (+4)
☑ Very Easy (+5)


Balanced Gameplay - Fair and equal.
☐ Poorly Balanced (+1)
☐ Somewhat Balanced (+2)
☑ Moderately Balanced (+3)
☐ Well Balanced (+4)
☐ Perfectly Balanced (+5)


Player Engagement - Involving and captivating.
☐ Not at all (+1)
☐ Slightly (+2)
☐ Moderately (+3)
☐ Very (+4)
☑ Extremely (+5)


Decision Relevance - Meaningful choices.
☐ Meaningless (+1)
☐ Not Meaningful (+2)
☑ Somewhat Meaningful (+3)
☐ Quite Meaningful (+4)
☐ Highly Meaningful (+5)

Note: This was based on the choices for base upgrade order and equipment brought into the regions. Nothing felt overly meaningful, my deaths wouldn't have changed if I had other equipment.

Rewarding Progression - Satisfying advancement.
☐ Very Unsatisfying (+1)
☐ Unsatisfying (+2)
☑ Neutral (+3)
☐ Satisfying (+4)
☐ Very Satisfying (+5)

Note: Progression feels smooth initially after completing a few initial quests but rapidly grinds to a crawl/standstill.

Presentation & Immersion (19/25)

Compelling Storyline - Engaging narrative.
☐ Not Interesting (+1)
☐ Slightly Interesting (+2)
☑ Moderately Interesting (+3)
☐ Very Interesting (+4)
☐ Extremely Interesting (+5)


Immersive Atmosphere - Captivating environment.
☐ Not Immersive (+1)
☐ Slightly Immersive(+2)
☑ Moderately Immersive (+3)
☐ Very Immersive (+4)
☐ Completely Immersive (+5)


Visual Aesthetics - Stunning graphics.
☐ Not Appealing (+1)
☐ Slightly Appealing (+2)
☐ Moderately Appealing (+3)
☐ Very Appealing (+4)
☑ Extremely Appealing (+5)


Audio Quality - High-quality sound.
☐ Not Engaging (+1)
☐ Slightly Engaging (+2)
☐ Moderately Engaging (+3)
☐ Very Engaging (+4)
☑ Extremely Engaging (+5)


Polished HUD - Clean and functional interface.
☐ Very Unfriendly (+1)
☐ Unfriendly (+2)
☑ Neutral (+3)
☐ Friendly (+4)
☐ Very Friendly (+5)


Design & Technical Aspects (17/25)

Game Design - Well-crafted mechanics.
☐ Poorly Designed (+1)
☐ Somewhat Designed (+2)
☑ Moderately Designed (+3)
☐ Well Designed (+4)
☐ Excellently Designed (+5)


Content Quality - Rich and diverse.
☐ Poor Content (+1)
☐ Limited Content (+2)
☑ Moderate Content (+3)
☐ Extensive Content (+4)
☐ Abundant Content (+5)


AI Behavior - Intelligent and realistic.
☐ Very Poor (+1)
☐ Poor (+2)
☑ Average (+3)
☐ Good (+4)
☐ Excellent (+5)


Settings - Flexible and customizable.
☐ Very Limited (+1)
☐ Limited (+2)
☐ Moderate (+3)
☑ Flexible (+4)
☐ Highly Flexible (+5)


Technical Issues - Minimal or no problems.
☐ Numerous (+1)
☐ Moderate (+2)
☐ Limited (+3)
☑ Minor (+4)
☐ None (+5)


Final Considerations (23/25)

Overall Satisfaction - General enjoyment level.
☐ Very Dissatisfied (+1)
☐ Dissatisfied (+2)
☐ Neutral (+3)
☐ Satisfied (+4)
☑ Very Satisfied (+5)


Microtransactions - In-game purchases.
☐ Extensive (+1)
☐ Substantial (+2)
☐ Moderate (+3)
☐ Minimal (+4)
☑ None (+5)


Replay Value - Longevity and replayability.
☐ Very Low (+1)
☐ Low (+2)
☐ Moderate (+3)
☑ High (+4)
☐ Very High (+5)


Cost-to-Play Ratio - Money spent vs hours played.
☐ Overpriced (+1)
☐ Poor Value (+2)
☐ Fair Value (+3)
☑ Good Value (+4)
☐ Excellent Value (+5)


Recommendation.
☐ No (+0)
☑ Yes (+5)
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Comments are disabled for this review.