Personally, I would preferr if there were no requirements like this at all. I'm safe, and will be for quite some time (I think I would be safe if it was 1:1 as well, but I'll need to double check that), but I preferr to host giveaways when I feel like it, not because I have to.

ya, i personally know that others will grump about it. but think the number should be even lower. i suggest 3-5 & then create a giveaway. but i do think 1:1 as aliasusername states, is even better.

At my current win rate I might never have to do another give away LOL!

As far as for me, I wouldn't have an issue with 1:1 even. It would sure keep things lively!

If you wanted to curve leeching. 1 giveaway required for every 4 wins. with the added rule of you must do a giveaway before that.

Example:
On your 5th win, you would have to create your 2nd ga.
On your 9th win, you would have to create your 3rd ga.
On your 13th win, you would have to create your 4th ga.

Or just lower the original ratio to 4wins:1ga. (4th win = make your 1st ga, on 8th win, make your 2nd ga)

That seems like the opposite of curving leeching. Was not it win 5, give 1?

Meaning if you win 20, you give 4; with the above if you win 26, you also give 4, sems like more leeching to me since you can now win more games for the same amount of gives.
No biggie, not like I win that many games anyway :D.

Maybe you ment to actually curve leeching, and just made a mistake in increasing the number of wins before you have to make a giveaway?

Ok thanks for the new info liquid!