It had potential but I can't recommend it. It really needed decent multiplayer since the A.I is pretty boring to play vs even on hardest settings. All it has is crappy LAN/WAN however. It needed more polish more stuff and probably some of their population/economy systems needed tweaks or reworks. It had bugs and problems left unfixed. Since it's been years and hardly anything changed I wondered what they were doing. It turns out they were making a DLC for the game which is very odd to me since the game is frankly unfinished in the first place.

Not a bad game ,
Definitely influenced by Lords of the realms , and there's definitely room for improvement

My main points to improve would be ,
1) frame rate (the last campaign battle was hideous , everything was taking ages to happen , frame rate was atrocious , also on the campaign MAP it would lag sometimes , and I would have to restart.
2) enemies after a battle (they retreat) seem to teleport to other regions , and skip the movement phase. meaning my army cannot catch up.and they attack a different region , so they get a free movement
3) the battle system heavily favors first strike , I think It would be best if the damage was more equal between the two opposing formations , especially as the numbers increase , you can sometimes take out the other stack in one hit , no damage to you at all.
4)battle deployment : it is silly to build a castle on a hill , to get the extra defense , and then during battle that tile belongs to your enemy for deployment , whats the point of having a castle then?

P.S I only played campaign , kinda lost my interest by the time it was finished.